L.A. & Ventura County DUI Attorney
Available 24/7

The Law Offices of Robert F. Sommers
Free Initial Consultation 805.919.8662
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • DUI Defense
  • Blog
  • Case Results
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
background

Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Police Officers in Jim McDonnell Case

  • Our Attorney

    Customized DUI Defense & Counsel

    Meet Robert Sommers
  • DUI Defense

    20+ Years of Aggressive DUI Defense

    Explore More
  • Contact Us

    Request Your No-Cost Case Evaluation

    Take the First Step
Blog Home - Previous Post | Next Post

Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Police Officers in Jim McDonnell Case

Posted on Jun 15, 2017 10:15am PDT

In early July, California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled that the names of Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department deputies who’ve falsified records, lied, stolen, and committed other types of “moral” misconduct remain confidential and cannot be given to prosecutors—even in pending criminal cases in which the officers are considered potential witnesses. The targeted group represents about 3% of the department’s roughly 9,100 deputies.

The ruling marks an end to the fight over a secret list—compiled by Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell—of 300 deputies whose history of misconduct could damage their credibility in the even they are called to testify in criminal cases. Last fall, the union sued the department the L.A. County sheriff’s attempt to disclose the names to the district attorney’s office, arguing that revealing the names to prosecutors—even in pending cases—would violate state peace officer confidentiality laws and invite biased scrutiny of deputies whose mistakes might have occurred a long time ago.

California is known to have some of the strictest protections on law enforcement officer records in the United States. Officers involved in misconduct or internal affair investigations are often kept secret.

How This Ruling Affects the Brady Motion

Sheriff McDonnell’s attempt to reveal the names of specific deputies to prosecutors wasn’t about charging these officers with the crimes, but rather highlighting the vulnerability of these officers’ credibility if they were to ever testify in court. Prosecutors would potentially need to disclose these names to defense attorneys.

According to the 1963 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Brady vs. Maryland, prosecutors are required to alert defendants to any evidence which could benefit the defense. Failure to do so could result in wrongful conviction. Evidence often entails information that could undermine an officer’s credibility.

However, there are at least a dozen counties in California that that practice what McDonnell was trying to do. For more than a decade, departments such as Santa Barbara and Ventura have been providing prosecutors with names of officers involved in some form of misconduct.

Alas, this most recent decision could start to change that. While the ruling only involves the Sheriff’s Department, experts say it could cause police unions throughout the state to refuse a prosecutor’s request to identify dubious officers who might be called as witnesses.

For more information, contact our Ventura DUI attorney at The Law Offices of Robert F. Sommers today.

Categories: News
Permalink

DUI Defense

How Can We Help You?

  • DUI Penalties
  • Multiple DUI Offenses
  • DUI Accidents
  • DUI Vehicular Manslaughter
  • DUI Appeals
  • Breath and Blood Tests
  • DUI Checkpoints
  • DUI with Child in the Car
  • DUI Involving Drugs or Medication
  • DUI Probation Violation
  • Field Sobriety Tests
  • Felony DUI
  • Ignition Interlock Device
  • Out of State DUI
  • Suspended Driver's License
  • Unlawful Police Stop
  • DMV Hearings
  • Underage DUI
  • Selecting a DUI Attorney

Recent Posts

  • Tips for Helping Guests Avoid a DUI this Holiday Season
  • Ignition Interlock Devices: Answers to Common Questions
  • DUI & Employment Background Checks: What You Should Know
  • Understanding Traffic Stops in California
  • Massachusetts Has Damaged DUI Suspects' Rights

Most Popular

  • Can the Police Take a Blood Test While I'm Unconscious?
  • Steps to Take After Getting a DUI
  • Anonymous Tips Can Be Considered "Probable Cause" in a DUI Case
  • How to Request Dash Cam Footage
  • I Was Drunk in a Parked Car-Is It Still DUI?

Related Posts

  • The Rules for Getting Stopped by Police
  • Can the Police Take a Blood Test While I'm Unconscious?
  • The Driving Patterns the Police Look For

Archives

  • 2017 (29)
    • October (4)
    • September (4)
    • August (3)
    • July (3)
    • June (2)
    • May (5)
    • April (3)
    • March (1)
    • January (4)
  • 2016 (34)
    • December (3)
    • November (4)
    • October (4)
    • September (4)
    • August (6)
    • June (2)
    • May (2)
    • April (3)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (2)
  • 2015 (4)
    • December (2)
    • November (2)

Get A Free DUI Defense Consultation

Our DUI Expert will respond shortly.

Send My Information
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
The Law Offices of Robert F. Sommers

Call Today (805) 919-8662

The Law Offices of Robert F. Sommers - Ventura DUI Attorney
2625 Townsgate Rd, Ste 330, Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 View Map
Main (805) 919-8662
Website: http://www.sommersdefenselaw.com/
© 2018 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.